<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast 1.1: Paul in his own words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2007/10/05/podcast-11-paul-in-his-own-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2007/10/05/podcast-11-paul-in-his-own-words/</link>
	<description>Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean houses my podcast, websites, blog, and publications, providing an entryway into social and religious life among Greeks, Romans, Jews, Christians, and others in the Roman empire.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:48:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Harland&#8217;s Podcast Series: Paul and his communities</title>
		<link>http://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2007/10/05/podcast-11-paul-in-his-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-72445</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Harland&#8217;s Podcast Series: Paul and his communities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2007/10/05/podcast-11-paul-in-his-own-words/#comment-72445</guid>
		<description>[...] Philip takes a historical approach, not a theological one. See Podcast 1.1: Paul in his own words for the first episode, as well as a link to the feed. While I cannot vouch for the series yet, having only listened to the first episode (and by now, a part of the second), I do find Philip&#8217;s stuff very informative. After all, he&#8217;s an expert in the field. I just have a couple of minor niggles, and a skeptical, critical thinking attitude that I carry into just about everything. I have a couple of niggles that I hope won&#8217;t show up too often in the rest of his podcasts, and a couple of questions and uncertainties that I&#8217;ll just have to live with or accept on his authority, because I&#8217;m not going to make a study of this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Philip takes a historical approach, not a theological one. See Podcast 1.1: Paul in his own words for the first episode, as well as a link to the feed. While I cannot vouch for the series yet, having only listened to the first episode (and by now, a part of the second), I do find Philip&#8217;s stuff very informative. After all, he&#8217;s an expert in the field. I just have a couple of minor niggles, and a skeptical, critical thinking attitude that I carry into just about everything. I have a couple of niggles that I hope won&#8217;t show up too often in the rest of his podcasts, and a couple of questions and uncertainties that I&#8217;ll just have to live with or accept on his authority, because I&#8217;m not going to make a study of this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

